At 10:42 PM 8/10/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: >PS> Can this be merged with RFC 80, or do they need to live apart? > >I believe they do. This portion can independently survive without >an exception mechanism. I'm only addressing the "what error did >I get". You are addressing the error handling mechanism. Gotcha. > >> =head2 Classification Schemes > >> > >> To be defined. Suggestions welcome. > >PS> I made a start in RFC 80. > >Have you looked at the current scheme used by lexical warnings? Yes, but it is structured along the lines needed by warnings and I see a poor match for run-time exceptions. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should have a Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors sho... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors sho... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated er... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generat... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors sho... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 85 (v1) All perl generated errors should ... Juanma Barranquero