> Perhaps Damian's want() (RFC 21) can be used to allow allow either return > type? Yes indeed. > Assuming that's adopted, of course. Sure looks to me like a good idea; I hope it does.
- Re: RFC 78 and shared vs unshared ... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchin... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Sear... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And ... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning ... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versio... Simply Hao
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Sear... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And ... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searching Bart Lateur
- RE: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searching Brust, Corwin
- Steve Simmons