On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:01:39AM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote: > Rather than proliferating the number of keywords eaten with all > these *ref varients, this sounds like a useful place for returning > an object with a default stringification of the class: > . . . > Ref RFC 37, RFC 73. I have no problem with this or any other solution that gets the data back. I'll add a comment to RFC78 that should those RFCs prevail, we'll follow them. For the record, I prefer hashes for that sort of thing too. But perl has traditionally done ordered list returns, and I followed in that vein.
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Ve... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Ve... Bennett Todd
- RFC 78 and shared vs unshared modu... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 78 and shared vs unshared ... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchin... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Sear... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And ... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning ... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versio... Simply Hao
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Sear... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And ... Steve Simmons
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searching Bart Lateur
- RE: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searching Brust, Corwin