On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:20:41 +1000, iain truskett wrote: >A call to people: > >Who here has actually used something other than a constant '1' in a >package? > >If so, why? (Possibly cite the code.) I have. Just for fun. 42; # the ultimate answer... # see "Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy" or a string. The joke is if you think of the subjective interpretation of how such a string evaluates to true. "Well, at least it compiles alright."; # if it doesn't then this won't be true... "Because I say so."; # Those d*mn kids... But nothing of all that is serious in any way. If there's a warning if a require'd or use'd file is empty, that's more than good enough for me. -- Bart.
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remov... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for fina Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for fina Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove require... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... William Setzer
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remov... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for... Damian Conway