On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:20:41 +1000, iain truskett wrote:
>A call to people:
>
>Who here has actually used something other than a constant '1' in a
>package?
>
>If so, why? (Possibly cite the code.)
I have. Just for fun.
42; # the ultimate answer...
# see "Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy"
or a string. The joke is if you think of the subjective interpretation
of how such a string evaluates to true.
"Well, at least it compiles alright.";
# if it doesn't then this won't be true...
"Because I say so."; # Those d*mn kids...
But nothing of all that is serious in any way.
If there's a warning if a require'd or use'd file is empty, that's more
than good enough for me.
--
Bart.
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remov... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for fina Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for fina Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove require... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... William Setzer
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remov... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for... Damian Conway
