On Mon, 07 Aug 2000, iain truskett wrote: > Who here has actually used something other than a constant '1' in a > package? > > If so, why? (Possibly cite the code.) I have. I've used 34. (Just 'cause I like the number.) I've also used the filename before. (I wanted to watch the order of various modules being used, and was testing out my implicit print hack. :-) Neither case should be considered justification for any decision being made. I tend to be a fringe programmer, and do things just because I can. -- Bryan C. Warnock ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... John Porter
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remov... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for fina Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for fina Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove require... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... William Setzer
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remov... iain truskett
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove req... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 55 (v1) Compilation: Remove requirement for... Damian Conway