Re: RFC 59 (v1) Proposal to utilize C<*> as the prefix t

[Peter Scott]

At 12:07 AM 8/8/00 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Aug 2000 10:56:40 -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
>
> >I meant that BEGIN, END, and INIT aren't declared as subs at present but
> >named blocks.  I was surprised to discover that they're put in the symbol
> >table anyway though.
>
>Check the docs again. [snip]
>     Four special subroutines act as package constructors and
>     destructors. These are the `BEGIN', `CHECK', `INIT', and `END'
>     routines. The `sub' is optional for these routines.

Drat.  I propose making it non-optional for P6.  ETOOMANYSPECIALCASES.  Any 
objections?

--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies