Re: RFC 59 (v1) Proposal to utilize C<*> as the prefix t

[Jonathan Scott Duff]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 10:56:40AM -0700, Peter Scott wrote:
> I meant that BEGIN, END, and INIT aren't declared as subs at present but 
> named blocks.  I was surprised to discover that they're put in the symbol 
> table anyway though.  But they're definitely in a different class, 
> syntactically if nothing else.

Ah, but they *are* subs and you've stated my point exactly.  They're
different beasts.  They're special.  Make them look special.
Radically special.  :-)

-Scott
-- 
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]