Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement

[Graham Barr]

On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 04:10:20AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
>    > If a switch is considered like a loop then next would be the same
>    > as 'break' in C, as would last and redo would repeat the switch.
> 
> But a switch is not a loop.

True, but in perl any block is considered to be a loop that
executes only once.

> Long and bitter experience indicates that fallthrough is a poor default
> (but a good *option*).

I guess it's what your used to.

Graham.