> Oh, the table thing. The switch statement is useful without learning the > complete table so I don't think complexity is a big problem. People can > learn what they need and ignore the rest. I agree with you that it might > be nice to have an array membership operator (like "in") so that you can > write: > > if ($x in [ 1, 2, 3 ]) ... if ( grep $x==$_, (1,2,3) ) ... Be nice if it would short-circuit in a boolean context though! Damian
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statem... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statem... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statem... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch s... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin swit... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch s... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Damian Conway
- ConwayPerl (was Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Bart Lateur
- RE: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Lipscomb, Al
- RE: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 22 (v1) Builtin switch statement Glenn Linderman