On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Hildo Biersma wrote: > If functions could distinguish between > 'wantarray' and 'wanthash' this would be easy to do. This reminds me -- once there was a proposal to extend the wantarray functionality on p5p. Anyone remember? Anyone want to turn it into an RFC? -- Johan
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requi... Bryan C . Warnock
- Memory Footprint of Perl System Calls (... mooring
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements,... Nathan Torkington
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requireme... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements,... Damian Conway
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boots... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on ... Hildo Biersma
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements,... Matt Sergeant
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interface (was Re: ... Johan Vromans
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interface (was ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interface (... Johan Vromans
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interface (... Damian Conway
- Re: wanthash (Was: Re: date interf... Piers Cawley
- Re: wanthash Dan Sugalski
- Re: wanthash Peter Scott
- Re: wanthash Graham Barr
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements,... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requireme... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requi... Simon Cozens