named parameters seem to be a popular item. i haven't seen much more
than a simple example syntax. how would the named params map onto or
modify @_? would the equivilent perl5 code just be
sub func {
my( $foo, @bar ) = @_ ;
blah ;
}
becomes:
sub func( $foo, @bar ) {
blah ;
}
are we looking for lexical and pass by value params? what if any type
checking (another popular subject) will be applied? what will be the
state of @_ afterwards?
it looks like typechecking and named params should fork off into a subs
subgroup. all of you with an itch to write an rfc, here is your chance.
uri
--
Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com
SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting
The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books
The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com
- named parameters Tim Jenness
- Re: named parameters Simon Cozens
- Re: named parameters Tim Jenness
- Re: named parameters Nathan Wiger
- Re: named parameters Ken Fox
- Re: named parameters Nathan Wiger
- Re: named parameters Tom Christiansen
- Re: named parameters Dan Sugalski
- Re: named parameters Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: named parameters Ken Fox
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Uri Guttman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Spider Boardman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... skud
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Damian Conway
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Hildo Biersma
- Re: New Group proposed: ... Andy Wardley
- Re: New Group proposed: ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: New Group proposed: ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: New Group proposed: ... J. David Blackstone
- Re: New Group proposed: ... J. David Blackstone
