Nathan Wiger wrote: > Because it has opportunity for bloat, I would suggest it should be in a > pragma: > > use strict 'prototypes'; Bloat? What bloat? I don't want to *bloat* all my programs by sticking a zillion pragmas in just to turn on all the features that makes Perl 6 different from Perl 5. If you want Perl 5 you know where to find it... Named parameters would be really nice BTW. I definitely hope they go in. - Ken
- named parameters Tim Jenness
- Re: named parameters Simon Cozens
- Re: named parameters Tim Jenness
- Re: named parameters Nathan Wiger
- Re: named parameters Ken Fox
- Re: named parameters Nathan Wiger
- Re: named parameters Tom Christiansen
- Re: named parameters Dan Sugalski
- Re: named parameters Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: named parameters Ken Fox
- New Group proposed: subs (was Re: ... Uri Guttman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (... Spider Boardman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (... skud
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was ... Damian Conway