If the file handle becomes an object, they'd be available via member functions
of the object for those that are curious, would they not?  And if it is less
than an object, a function could be provided to obtain a pid from a handle.

Tom Christiansen wrote:

> >It seems that this issue is definitely worth a quick RFC - something
> >like "proposal to return filehandles from open/opendir rather than supply
> >as arguments".
>
> What about the pids that come back from begotten processes, as in
>
>     open(FILTER, "| cat -v | sort | lpr")
> or
>     open(MESELF, "|-")
>
> --tom

--
Glenn
=====
There  are two kinds of people, those
who finish  what they start,  and  so
on...                 -- Robert Byrne


_______________________________________________
Why pay for something you could get for free?
NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

Reply via email to