>Not sure I agree with that. I think one point of confusion / perceived >difference between filehandles, open(), and basically every other >builtin is that all the others *return* what you want. tie and bless and chop and chomp also all act upon their argument(s). Just to name a few. bless has the nice side effect of returning it, too, but the rest are probably subject to your confusion issue. --tom
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Larry Wall
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Graham Barr
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Glenn Linderman