At 11:57 AM 8/2/00 -0400, John Porter wrote: >Tom Christiansen wrote: > > >I feel strongly that "my" and "our" should both be renamed, > > >as well as "local". > > > > What then do you propose? my() and our() were chosen for their brevity. > >Well, "var" is pretty short. And perhaps globals could be declared >with something like "var global". Extra verbosity required for globals >might be A Good Thing. Argh, you're giving me Pascal flashbacks. P5 P6 local save my my our our Keep 'em short. As for making lexicals the default, I ain't giving up the typo-catching effect of use strict 'vars'. So you'd need something like use strict 'declarations' which would require all variables to be declared with one of the above three before first use (or be package-qualified). -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (revi... J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default (revi... Nick Ing-Simmons
- RE: RFC: lexical variables made default Ala Qumsieh
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made defau... skud
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made ... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables m... John Porter