RE: RFC: lexical variables made default

[Ala Qumsieh]

Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 08:45:04AM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> > Anything one chooses potentially conflicts with the user's 
> > namespace, but probably save() or temp() would be better, 
> > or even savetemp() or tempsave() or scopetemp().
> 
> How about deliver() or preserve()?

How about contain() or detach() or revalue()?

Also, how about renaming my() to local()? Will this be too confusing?

--Ala