On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 11:37:06AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > > > If it is decided (and I hope not) that localtime and its kin are verboten, > > it should not exists _at all_ in Perl6 and any existance at all would be > > only as a support module for Perl5 backward compatiblity. > > Well we should still have POSIX::localtime(). True, and hopefully in a more optimal form. Graham.
- date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on bootstr... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Tim Jenness
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Nathan Wiger
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Andy Dougherty
- Re: date interface (was ... Graham Barr
- Re: date interface (was ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was ... Graham Barr
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Tim Jenness
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Bart Lateur
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... J. David Blackstone