On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:13:44PM -0500, J. David Blackstone wrote: > Creating an all new function is a very good idea, I think. The > whole function "localtime" should just plain go away. Also remember that localtime() is intimately tied to gmtime(), and timelocal(), timegm() of Time::Local. If we replace localtime() with something saner, we'll have to find a sane inverse as well. date2gmt() and gmt2date() any one? -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on bootstr... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Tim Jenness
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Nathan Wiger
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Andy Dougherty
- Re: date interface (was ... Graham Barr
- Re: date interface (was ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: date interface (was ... Graham Barr
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Tim Jenness
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski