Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> "CF" == Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>>>> "TA" == Ted Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > TA> In general, they do what you want, unless you want consistency. > > CF> Randal, Tom, et. al. > > CF> How locked in to your brain is this lack of consistency? How un-perlish > CF> would it be to cleanup, crypto-context, or the meaning of a list in > CF> a scalar context, or ... > > (Kirrily, this one is for the record.) > > I'd also like to add, redo, next, last escaping a subroutine. They do? Cool. -- Piers
- Re: perl 6 requirements Larry Wall
- Re: perl 6 requirements Matthew Persico
- Re: perl 6 requirements Ted Ashton
- Re: perl 6 requirements Ted Ashton
- Re: perl 6 requirements Roland Giersig
- Re: perl 6 requirements Ted Ashton
- Re: perl 6 requirements Tom Christiansen
- Re: perl 6 requirements Ted Ashton
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements skud
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Alan Burlison
- Re: perl 6 requirements Tom Christiansen
- Re: perl 6 requirements Simon Cozens