At 4:19 PM +0000 1/24/02, Dave Mitchell wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That was my biggest objection. I like the thought of having a scheme
>> pair data type. The interpreter should see it, and it should be
>> accessed, as a restricted array, one with only two entries.
>
>Is this then the same datatype as a Perl6 pair (cf '=>' op in Apo 3) ??
Good point. it probably is, yes. (Though there may be potential
differences--depends on whether the scheme pair can only have scalars
on each side, or should allow other things)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
