At 6:04 PM +0100 1/22/02, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
>Hello,
>
>some time ago (before I went to holidays) I posted a patch
>implementing Schemepairs, but I didn't get any comments about this. I
>am wondering what is the reason for this.
>
>Was the patch too long, or too outdated (I can resend a newer version
>of the patch agains current anoncvs).
I had some issues with it, and then it got lost in the shuffle. My
fault, and I apologize.
>Or is the problem that the patch introduces new core.ops and vtable
>entries? I have no idea how to get and set a PMC element the other
>way.
That was my biggest objection. I like the thought of having a scheme
pair data type. The interpreter should see it, and it should be
accessed, as a restricted array, one with only two entries.
The PMC indexing bits are going to be rejigged in a little while, and
when they are I'll post a summary to the list and get some docs in
the source kit.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
