Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>How much of the current base of target ports are you willing to give up in
>the first cut for fast? The TIL suggestion, amongst others, has the
>potential to speed things up rather a lot, but it has the disadvantage of
>requiring intimate knowledge of each target port. 

We should be able to code a TIL kernel in C which would 
compile to sane code on any RISC machine.
(We have one in Pascal round here some place...)

-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.

Reply via email to