On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> cd languages && make test >> >> Had a LOT of failures recently. I just: >> - fixed up some APL that was using crufty parrot (that I myself broke >> but never noticed because of...) >> - ... TODO'd some more APL that used to work aeons ago that I don't >> have time to diagnose before the release >> - temporarily removed 5 languages from unified testing because they >> are failing many of their tests (lua, PIR, scheme, urm, Zcode) >> >> There are still a few failures remaining: >> >> befunge/t/basic.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 1 >> Non-zero exit status: 1 >> jako/t/examples.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 15 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 1 >> Non-zero exit status: 1 >> ook/t/basic.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 1 >> Non-zero exit status: 1 >> tcl/t/cmd_lsort.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 0) >> Non-zero exit status: 1 >> tcl/t/cmd_namespace.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21 Failed: 0) >> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 39 tests but ran 21. >> >> The first tcl failure is a result of the inferior runloop problem. All >> tests pass, but the file fails. I can move the one offending test into >> a separate file that isn't run by the unified harness as a stopgap, if >> this is desired. >> >> The second tcl failure is a result of recent changes to the namespace PMC. >> >> The eventual goal of this cleanup is to get these tests running via >> smolder to give core developers more feedback on their commits. The >> aborted test in this file can be TODOd if we can't fix the root cause >> before release. > > Which is slightly more difficult than it looks: A patch doing this to > the 2 affected tests is available here: > > http://nopaste.snit.ch/13830 > >> The short term goal is to have a relatively clean languages-test for >> the release.
Please note that languages/tcl/t/cmd_namespace.t is still dying as of the branch point. -- Will "Coke" Coleda
