On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cd languages && make test > > Had a LOT of failures recently. I just: > - fixed up some APL that was using crufty parrot (that I myself broke > but never noticed because of...) > - ... TODO'd some more APL that used to work aeons ago that I don't > have time to diagnose before the release > - temporarily removed 5 languages from unified testing because they > are failing many of their tests (lua, PIR, scheme, urm, Zcode) > > There are still a few failures remaining: > > befunge/t/basic.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > jako/t/examples.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 15 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > ook/t/basic.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 1 > Non-zero exit status: 1 > tcl/t/cmd_lsort.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > tcl/t/cmd_namespace.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21 Failed: 0) > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 39 tests but ran 21. > > The first tcl failure is a result of the inferior runloop problem. All > tests pass, but the file fails. I can move the one offending test into > a separate file that isn't run by the unified harness as a stopgap, if > this is desired. > > The second tcl failure is a result of recent changes to the namespace PMC. > > The eventual goal of this cleanup is to get these tests running via > smolder to give core developers more feedback on their commits. The > aborted test in this file can be TODOd if we can't fix the root cause > before release.
Which is slightly more difficult than it looks: A patch doing this to the 2 affected tests is available here: http://nopaste.snit.ch/13830 > The short term goal is to have a relatively clean languages-test for > the release. > > -- > Will "Coke" Coleda > -- Will "Coke" Coleda
