On Saturday 05 July 2008 09:42:33 Jeff Horwitz wrote:
> In r29081, the following code segfaults:
>
> module Foo::Bar;
> sub foo() { say "bar"; }
> foo(); # segfaults here
>
> The script works if the modules declaration is omitted. I also tried
> running with -G, and it still segfaults at the same place. pmichaud was
> able to reproduce as well.
>
> Backtrace follows:
>
> #0 0x402cc6df in Parrot_Closure_invoke (interp=0x804f048, pmc=0x4161e700,
> in_next=0x868e23c) at closure.pmc:103
> 103 else if ((PObj_get_FLAGS(outer_sub) & SUB_FLAG_IS_OUTER)
> &&
Random guess: foo() is a Closure PMC, but it doesn't have an outer. Aren't
all Subs generated from Rakudo Closures at the moment?
-- c
