On Wednesday 07 May 2008 19:35:03 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 18:22 -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> > > Long-term: We need a Parrot design document on configuration. Such > > > a document should cover what configuration is, why we have decided to > > > include the configuration steps already there, what we need and what > > > we don't need. Such a document should distinguish between what we > > > need between now and 1.0 OTOH and post-1.0 OTO. > > > > There has been no support for this suggestion from the key people. > I know I don't qualify as "key people" (not being a committer), but I > and others agreed such a document would be a good thing. > > So I am withdrawing this ticket and classifying it as rejected. > I think Warnock applies, rather than assuming you got -1 from all > voters. It gets +1 from me, if there's a volunteer to do it (and that volunteer isn't me). -- c
