On Fri Feb 15 07:38:37 2008, coke wrote: > On Thu Feb 14 08:26:05 2008, pmichaud wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:29:25PM -0800, Will Coleda wrote: > > > compilers/nqp/t/01-literals.t, for example, has a shebang of: > > > > > > #!./parrot > > > > > > but contains a test file written in NQP, not PIR. > > > > > > Before we can re-enable the pir_code_coda test, these files need to be > > > updated to have a proper shebang. > > > > Do we yet know what "a proper shebang" is for these cases? > > > > I suspect the #!./parrot shebang in the NQP test is simply > > cruft left over from a previous test file -- I wouldn't have > > any problem with removing it or changing it to something else. > > > > Pm > > > > Seems like the best short term fix here is to use "#!./parrot nqp.pbc" - > the shebang is ignored during the test at the moment, but this indicates > that the source should be run as NQP and not PIR. (once it is respected > by the test harness or the OS.)
Done, for NQP, rakudo, and pynie. Closing ticket.
