On 10/1/07, Nuno 'smash' Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetins parrot people, > > On 9/28/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Smash and I have been communicating about about the PIR PDD > > (docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod). He has started it, and is continuing to > > refine it. Anyone is welcome to pitch in on that. He'll let me know when > > it's ready to review, and I'll give it a final workout before launch. A > > group draft followed by architect review/revise is a great way to keep > > architectural consistency without blocking on one person's time. It's > > especially appropriate with this topic, since we have a good number of > > people around who have used PIR, and so have a sense of how it works and > > how it could be better. > > Still working on it. Sorry, but haven't had much free time lately, but > i'll try to finish this ASAP. > > > The PASM PDD (docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod) is open to the same > > treatment, if anyone wants to volunteer to take point on the drafting > > process. > > If noone beats me to ir, I can't try to work on that one too after > finishing pdd19.
Rush is truly enemy of perfection. What i meant was: If noone beats me to it, i can try to work on that one after finishing pdd19. > > Allison > > ./smash >
