Greetins parrot people,

On 9/28/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Smash and I have been communicating about about the PIR PDD
> (docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod). He has started it, and is continuing to
> refine it. Anyone is welcome to pitch in on that. He'll let me know when
> it's ready to review, and I'll give it a final workout before launch.  A
> group draft followed by architect review/revise is a great way to keep
> architectural consistency without blocking on one person's time. It's
> especially appropriate with this topic, since we have a good number of
> people around who have used PIR, and so have a sense of how it works and
> how it could be better.

Still working on it. Sorry, but haven't had much free time lately, but
i'll try to finish this ASAP.

> The PASM PDD (docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod) is open to the same
> treatment, if anyone wants to volunteer to take point on the drafting
> process.

If noone beats me to ir, I can't try to work on that one too after
finishing pdd19.

> Allison

./smash

Reply via email to