On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:13:45AM -0700, jerry gay wrote: > then what the heck does c89 compliance mean for parrot, if it's beyond > our control because we can't change system headers? i mean, how do you
The Parrot code itself can be C89 compliant, such that Parrot contains no issues that prevent it from being complied with a seriously fastidious compiler on a platform where the system headers are also suitably compliant. Surprisingly Solaris is not such a platform. [Solaris is very carefully engineered in so many other ways, that I had expected that it would be] Nicholas Clark
