On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:41:44AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 08:03:47AM -0700, Audrey Tang wrote: > > 2006/6/24, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >Is Parrot assembler considered a more productive language to write in than > > >C? > > >If yes, is it logical to write opcodes such as this one in Parrot assembler > > >itself? > > > > Err, well, that will likely completely kill the performance. :-)
> Part of me wonders if OUTER occurs frequently enough that it > needs a C-based opcode. However, given that we have at least Which was sort of my question, although I wasn't clear. > two languages (Perl 6 and Tcl) that are indicating they need > to be able to do OUTER lookups, it may deserve an opcode. Is it only possible to write parrot opcodes in C? Nicholas Clark
