On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 01:43:03PM -0700, Matt Diephouse wrote: > While you can't do this with find_lex currently, you *can* do it. Tcl > walks the lexpads to find lexicals. (See > languages/tcl/runtime/variables.pir):
[Parrot assembler implementation] > Of course, that doesn't mean that I wouldn't like an opcode to do it for > me. :-) Is Parrot assembler considered a more productive language to write in than C? If yes, is it logical to write opcodes such as this one in Parrot assembler itself? Nicholas Clark
