Moin, On Monday 13 March 2006 23:01, David Golden wrote: > Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > > In addition to getting CPANPLUS fixed, I feel there is the > > issue of what to do about such fallacious reports in the > > CPAN Testers database. Currently, there is no functionality > > for deleting such reports. > > This issue also has frustrated me for some time, but I don't think that > we should be considering deleting reports. Reports are just facts -- > they have no value basis. Yes, people may make judgments about the > robustness of a module based on pass/fail percentages, but I don't > think we should alter the raw data. > > I'd rather see the ability for test reports to be annotated (e.g. by > the author), or I'd like to see another site that summarizes the raw > data and can filter down to a more reliable set of statistics.
Well, OTOH such bogus reports are junk and should really be deleted. I had FAIL reports because the testing system crashed midway (or couldn't unwrap a tar file or whatever) etc. and these things really should be hidden from view or be deleted alltogether. I don't care how, but as a developer/user, I don't want to see them. Best wishes, Tels -- Signed on Tue Mar 14 00:01:17 2006 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email. This email violates U.S. patent #4,197,590: for (x = 0; x < widht; x++) { for (y = 0; y < height; y++) { setPixel (x+xm, y+ym, getPixel(x+xm,y+ym) ^ getCursorPixel(x,y); } }
pgpUc0l3ib73V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
