* David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 23:05]: >This issue also has frustrated me for some time, but I don't >think that we should be considering deleting reports. Reports >are just facts -- they have no value basis. Yes, people may make >judgments about the robustness of a module based on pass/fail >percentages, but I don't think we should alter the raw data.
Errm, here’s a question: in which way does it benefit *any* use of the raw data to preserve those bogus reports, even annotated? I can’t think of any reason why anyone would ever need to know about those, but maybe my imagination is limited. Can you list some? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
