It looks like the CREDITS file hasn't been getting updated. I'd like to revise that check-list to:
- add the patch author to CREDITS or update the authors entry in CREDITS - add correspondence to the bug stating that the patch was applied AND the svn revision number. - make sure that the bugs 'Tag' includes 'Patch' - set the bugs 'Patch Status' to 'Applied' - set the bugs 'Status' to 'resolved' -J -- On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:28:48PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > Hi Folks, > > As part of my RT 'clean-up' project I've been trying to get bug metadata > into a consistent state. Maybe someday we'll be able to generate some > worthless statistics that will look pretty in a presentation. :) > > Anyways, It would be great if everyone handled bugs in the same manner. > I'm planning on writing a 'Bug Wrangling' document to outline some > suggested practices but I'm short on tuits this month. Since [PATCH] > bugs appear to be most frequently resolved bug type, here's a simple > checklist for how I'd suggest resolving them if the patch has been > applied. > > - add correspondence to the bug stating that the patch was applied AND > the svn revision number. > - make sure that the bugs 'Tag' includes 'Patch' > - set the bugs 'Patch Status' to 'Applied' > - set the bugs 'Status' to 'resolved' > > Cheers, > > -J > > --
pgp46VwQs0ZWT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
