On 9/6/05, Thomas Sandlass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. To make :: indicate type or meta was my primary concern.
Okay, now why don't you tell us about this new binary :: you're proposing. Luke
- Re: Proposal: split ternary ?? :: into binary ?? and // Luke Palmer
- RE: Proposal: split ternary ?? :: into binary ?? a... Thomas Sandlass
- Re: Proposal: split ternary ?? :: into binary ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Proposal: split ternary ?? :: into binary ... Larry Wall
- Re: Proposal: split ternary ?? :: into bin... Patrick R. Michaud
- Re: Proposal: split ternary ?? :: into bin... Juerd
- Re: Proposal: split ternary ?? :: into bin... Simon Cozens
