On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:32:39AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > > I think that's a powerful argument even if we don't have an infix:<::>. > Plus I hate all infix "nor" operators due to my English-speaking bias > that requires a "neither" on the front. So let's go ahead and make > it ??!!. (At least this week...)
Yay !! Pm