-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Moin,
On Monday 27 June 2005 00:37, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:57:05PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > 1 the refs came from \&somefunc
> > 2 the refs come from evaling strings of code
> > 3 the refs are closures and therefore have some data associated with
> > them
> >
> > For 3, it looks like B::Deparse does't handle the data at all so even
> > if the deparsed subs are identical they may behave totally
> > differently.
>
> This will simply have to be a caveat. Fortunately, if B::Deparse ever
> gets this right we'll immediately benefit.
>
> > For 2 B::Deparse works and might be the only way but then again, it
> > might be better to just get access to the original string of code
> > before it gets compiled,
>
> If they want to compare the original string they should have put it in
> their data structure. Simp.
And comparing the original string doesn't tell you that "sub { 1+2; }" is
"equal" to "sub { 3; }" :-)
Best wishes,
Tels
- --
Signed on Mon Jun 27 18:40:51 2005 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/
PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"The UAC is making safer worlds through superior firepower."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQsAsRHcLPEOTuEwVAQFqwAf/RfuAE7ayPYK7s4y7DiDP2urt+T8gI/Y9
c19jLJ96GUosiFs4HJ0OpLBMPMmGa6Wcrztv0bq9qfltJBS5TQ4YbDe+ugB3sU3X
YhxMTNIFFQ3k6XfIN+dUvmc+ziyysYiOCwrDb0lAPwkABf6EzFqaSE7iB+nAIpjk
VLY3+GSZaVyABNuBdSimmrwZldkfEZUpqvLjY5RS4sHLMItqpZdlS5QfWSmXYd5M
RBfVUZ4ATnGlYqCsh0kky/cpR69ARO7tXbcVjRiyG6YrFahG/dyNjgJNOOdIeusL
e17NQpfs5E8N7acshwcGABVbPCX/LCz9CsUufxbIbt4nzX1DcpAZTw==
=73QQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
