On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:21:48AM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote: > That's only 2 months old (according to CPAN) before that it would have > just failed or passed (failed in this case). Is it in bleadperl? I'd > be amazed if no one anywhere was using is_deeply with coderefs.
It was undefined, accidental behavior. If anyone was relying on it I haven't heard. I didn't even notice code refs were broken until Collin brought it up and I'm not sure exactly when they broke. Yes, its in bleadperl. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern Don't try the paranormal until you know what's normal. -- "Lords and Ladies" by Terry Prachett
