On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:00:15PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote: > On 5/11/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In a somewhat related topic: > > > > pugs> (1,(2,3),4)[2] > > 4 > > > > Because the invocant to .[] assumes a Singular context. > > Right, but the *inside* of the invocant is still a list, so it's in > list context. I think that line should return 3.
You're totally right, and I was clearly wahnsinnig. It now returns 3. Thanks, /Autrijus/
pgpLFhPsoPG5N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
