All~ On 5/11/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/11/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In a somewhat related topic: > > > > pugs> (1,(2,3),4)[2] > > 4 > > > > Because the invocant to .[] assumes a Singular context. > > Right, but the *inside* of the invocant is still a list, so it's in > list context. I think that line should return 3.
I am confused as to why exactly this is the case. Are you saying that nested lists like this flatten? That would certainly catch me off guard. Would you mind explaining that to me a little more? Thanks, Matt -- "Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory." -???
