Re: [Pugs] Stumbled into another Pugs sand trap (indirect object call I think)

[Autrijus Tang]

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:20:31AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> That's actually because of the list of allowed characters in a variable
> name included : to support $Foo::bar.  Unfortuately, it would also
> support $Fo:oba:r, and your $label .  It appears to be fixed as of r868.

Hey. Is "&infix:Y" a valid variable name?

Thanks,
/Autrijus/

pgpwFmSACn4Gw.pgp
Description: PGP signature