On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:27:04PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote: : On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:25:26AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: : > Of course not. &infix:<Y> refers to the infix Y operator, but you need : > the hashy subscript. : : So, what is the full name for the operator in the symbol table? :)
%::{'&infix:<Y>'}, I suspect. &::('infix:<Y>') should also get to it
as a symbolic reference. Of course, it can actually be stored as "Woot!",
as long as you translate both directions. :-)
Larry
