On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 11:22:23AM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote: > It looks like the current pugs array interpolation doesn't quite match > the description in S02. > [...]
This a (hopefully friendly) note regarding cross posting between perl6-compiler (p6c) and perl6-language (p6l). We're still feeling our way around regarding "what belongs on p6c vs. p6l", but it seems pretty clear to me that if the question is one of "perl6/pugs doesn't properly implement feature X as given by the spec" then the post belongs strictly on p6c. We only bring p6l into the discussion if the spec is ambiguous and it's something that can't be easily decided/discussed within p6c itself. This is just to keep cross-postings and traffic to a minimum. Patches to pugs or the perl6 compiler certainly belong *only* on p6c. This message isn't intended as a rebuke at all -- all of the patches, questions, and suggestions are very welcome! It's just a clarification since we're still just gettings underway on p6c. Pm
