On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 11:42:17AM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote: > Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > >On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 11:22:23AM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote: > > > >>It looks like the current pugs array interpolation doesn't quite match > >>the description in S02. > >>[...] > >>So what's right, the spec or the implementation? > > > > > >I should've also mentioned in my previous post that in this case, > >the spec is correct. In general, for purposes of the compiler(s) > >we always assume that the spec is correct unless it's ambiguous > >or it leads to an absurd/contradictory conclusion, in which case > >we get the p6l folks to clarify/correct the spec. > > That's what I though, but Autrijus suggested I check with p6l first.
Okay, no problem. We're still learning and establishing where the fuzzy boundaries are. :-) Perhaps a useful default will be to always start out by posting messages and questions only to perl6-compiler. Then if the answers aren't available through p6c, we can then rephrase the questions in terms of language design and forward them to p6l. Pm
