At 4:26 PM +0100 8/24/04, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
As for rounding, I'm open to changes there too. Standard for
computing is round-to-zero, since it's easy (drop the fractional
part) but I was always taught round-to-closest-int. Too many physical
sciences classes, I expect. Either way's arguably correct, and
arguably horribly wrong, so I can see it being a big tossup there.
I'd be confused if a computer language didn't truncate towards zero.
Despite being a physical scientist by training.
Fair enough -- we'll round to zero then.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------it's like this-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
