On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 10:49:37AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > As for rounding, I'm open to changes there too. Standard for > computing is round-to-zero, since it's easy (drop the fractional > part) but I was always taught round-to-closest-int. Too many physical > sciences classes, I expect. Either way's arguably correct, and > arguably horribly wrong, so I can see it being a big tossup there.
I'd be confused if a computer language didn't truncate towards zero. Despite being a physical scientist by training. Nicholas Clark
