On Tue, 4 May 2004 09:11:00 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> Is there anything specific that is known to be broken/not yet implemented >> on Win32? Anything else I can help with? > > One more thing comes to my mind. That's dynamic loading of classes and > bytecode (dynclasses/ and dynoplibs/). Win32 needs AFAIK much more > symbols in libparrot.def. We should AFAIK denote the program source with > some typedefs like > > PARROT_API Parrot_some_func > > so that a .def file can be created automatically.
I'll start with this one, as it should be simple enough. Then I'll worry about the event stuff. I have attached a proposal for a TODO.win32 for your consideration. Ron
TODO_win32.patch
Description: Binary data
