Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there anything specific that is known to be broken/not yet implemented > on Win32? Anything else I can help with?
One more thing comes to my mind. That's dynamic loading of classes and bytecode (dynclasses/ and dynoplibs/). Win32 needs AFAIK much more symbols in libparrot.def. We should AFAIK denote the program source with some typedefs like PARROT_API Parrot_some_func so that a .def file can be created automatically. > Ron leo
