On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 15:19, stevan little wrote: > If 5.6.1 is the official minimum, then maybe this brings back up the -w > vs. warnings issue? Since Ovid pointed out that 5.6 was the minimum for > the warnings pragma, and 5.6.1 is your "official" minimum, it seems > maybe the choice is back on the table.
What's the point of changing it? If you're not using lexical warnings in the test, it does the same thing. Change for change's sake is often counterproductive to your goal. -- c
